A Students Text On the Law of Principal And Agent

de them.8 The liability in question, clearly, does not depend upon the existence of a relation of principal and agent between the parties;7 but is rather an obligation directly imposed by law out of motives of public policy. Without discussing the wisdom of this practice of attaching legal rules to divisions of law where accurately they do not belong, it may be stated that in this treatment of the subject we are not concerned with '' agency created by law,'' but are to deal with a relation founded on agreement of the parties. § 4. Master and servant. The relation of master and servant is somewhat analogous to that of principal and agent. Different tests have been applied to distinguish them, such as the term of employment, the mode of compensation, the manner of rendering service and the like.8 8 In those cases where the law authorizes a wife to pledge her husband's credit even against his will, it creates a compulsory agency. Benjamin v. Dockham, 134 Mass. 418. textit{1 Thus, the husband is liable though the goods were furnished against his positive orders. He is liable, however, only for what the law deems necessaries and only for a price that the law deems reasonable. In no sense would he be bound by virtue of his wife's agreement, as he would be were she his agent. The liability arises in the absence of any agreement by the wife and hence does not depend upon existence of a relation of principal and agent between husband and wife. s Lang v. Simmons, 64 Wi...